by Robh » Tue Oct 07, 2008 4:13 pm
I forwarded the following question for Sylv :-
Do you think the differences in results in the recovery could be due to different person's perception of a "8" on the scale of "10"? Or wanting to do as well as you can at the risk of riding to say a 9? Keith's LBP figures are better than mine but recovery poorer. Do you check for a correlation between max HR and HR @ level 8? Saying that if Keith was able to chat @ 300w he was probably doing ok at that rate.
From Andrew Sellars :-
Yes, you do need to be careful about comparing recovery lines between two different people, having taken them to their own perceived 8/10...however, we use the green line as an indicator of recovery, not an absolute measurement of recovery. So watch for the changes over time, and the ability to recover from similar wattages in future tests. As Mike's results show, he can now ramp up over 400 watts, and recover quickly even at 280-300...so a dramatic improvement not achieved by "threshold work", but by constant attention to structural training.
It is good to have some results from solid riders on the books, if only to show how the test can be used to guide training, rather than proving that it can find the good riders...Focus on the test as an individual assessment, and overlap only to show potential differences that can explain what they are noticing on the road. It gets easier once you have a rider you have directed and stays with the program and then achieves the changes you expect. If the changes don't occur, it is most likely that they have NOT followed the program, rather than the program not being well conceived. If you are surprised by the results after a given time period of training...give them three days of rest, and retest them.