Hey, thanks for the translation ,great job ,and as I read it ,it even sounds logic
. Will be a very expensive forum for me over time , to pay all the translaters and heart and headache medication for the readers going through my info.
Well I can try to pay this as a guide here on a canou trip , should you ever drop by and free accomodation by the lake. Thanks so much for the acceptance of my small input.
Last but not least :
Paul's point of interpretation.
To find the LBP does not need any interpretation as it is given by the lactate trend.
To find the change from STF to FTF needs very little interpretation as you can take either RQ .85 or the lowest FeO2 % and people just can read that out.
If you have only a bioharness use the softwear with the VT information and anybody who tests this will have the same VT info.
HRV: look at the polar watch and once it shifts stable to .oo4 ms you have the top of the recovery zone or the start of the STF zone.
To see the change from oxygen independent gluycose to oxygen independent phosphat check the first step , where the O2/breath starts to drop.
In any of the tests we do we sometimes give the interpretation to a person, who never did the test and ask them to tell us where they see a trend in the info. This is a nice way to test , how objectively the results realy are.
But Paul is right : interpretations of traditional testing is often tricky and ends up with different results. ( Conconi / VO2 max/max HR/step tests and many of the strength assessments)