ChainGang 17.03

I know all this training business makes us sound a bit serious but, well, some people really are into this bike lark so feel free to talk about all training & self improvement related topics in here

Re: ChainGang 17.03

Postby Antloony » Thu Mar 19, 2009 9:47 pm

[quote="-Adam-"]He should be on the correct gears regardless of whether or not he's racing, the rules are there for a reason. Its just like in a gym, a teenager shouldn't be trying to bench press the same weight as a 30 year old beef cake.


Your right Adam, the rules are there to look after his legs as he's still growing (as I'm sure you know all this) but he wouldn't have lasted 2 mins last night as he was stuck on the 39 ring so I adjusted his bike so he could get up on the big ring. I told him to put it back when he got home.


[quote="-Adam-"]If he is joining ACC, or if he already has, I hope the relevant people make sure he is looked after properly. If he can give you lot what for on a chaingang, then he's obviously got potential. So don't let him waste it.


Oh he has potential alright, as you say its getting the relevant people to look after him but not sure if the club has anyone suitable does it? I don't honestly know.
User avatar
Antloony
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 1953
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 5:08 pm
Location: Sutton

Re: ChainGang 17.03

Postby Michelle » Thu Mar 19, 2009 9:55 pm

Huw is the Clubs coach, and a Go Ride accreditted coach too. You ought to let him know.
User avatar
Michelle
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 958
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 9:17 pm
Location: Hurst Green

Re: ChainGang 17.03

Postby Antloony » Thu Mar 19, 2009 9:57 pm

Oh yeah...forgot about Huw :oops:

Thanks Michelle.
User avatar
Antloony
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 1953
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 5:08 pm
Location: Sutton

Re: ChainGang 17.03

Postby Paul H » Thu Mar 19, 2009 10:51 pm

I cant see any harm in Jack using bigger gears for training especialy with all the hills we have here. There,s loads of juniors rowing who are putting far more stress through there knees without any problems. I wouldnt recommend low cadence hill work though.
Paul H
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 1648
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2003 5:26 pm
Location: Coulsdon

Re: ChainGang 17.03

Postby -Adam- » Fri Mar 20, 2009 12:16 am

I didn't think you would, somehow.

If you can't race on the big gears, you may as well not train on them either. My coach, and the rest of the management at InGear have a lot of exeperience with youths and juniors, and all agree that the restricted gear thing is definately best, in all circumstances.
User avatar
-Adam-
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 3515
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 9:38 pm
Location: Kingston/Epsom, well, everywhere really!

Re: ChainGang 17.03

Postby Toks » Fri Mar 20, 2009 12:52 am

So who's the contact with Jack? Common guys we need to take the initiative here other wise he'll be racing for VCL, Dynamos or Norwood Paragon if we're not lucky. We're essentially a club of 30 and 40 something blokes without any Juniors or youth ridetrs so lets get him on board :D :D
Toks
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 4107
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2003 10:17 pm
Location: Highbury, North London

Re: ChainGang 17.03

Postby Paul H » Fri Mar 20, 2009 1:22 pm

[quote]If you can't race on the big gears, you may as well not train on them either


Doesnt make sense. Why do you do big gear efforts up box hill if you do not intend to race like that then?

[quote]My coach, and the rest of the management at InGear have a lot of exeperience with youths and juniors, and all agree that the restricted gear thing is definately best, in all circumstances.


I bet they cannot say from personal experience why they beleive that. Thats not the opinion of all coaches. Probably the majority of coaches are of that opion though as they lack inovation and just tend to follow the trend and tradition rather than think things out themselves.
Paul H
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 1648
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2003 5:26 pm
Location: Coulsdon
Top

Re: ChainGang 17.03

Postby Ben » Fri Mar 20, 2009 2:47 pm

I thought he was a member of Sutton but could be wrong.

As for gear restrictions, isn't part of the aim, to encourage good pedaling technique, i.e. smooth & supple first through spinning, then adding power later.
As it's much harder to go the other way round. Though there is a big jump between, juvenile and junior, gear restrictions pretty much a chain ring from memory. Though if you are approaching 16, I'd guess it would make sense to move towards the junior restrictions.
Ben
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 495
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 11:54 am

Re: ChainGang 17.03

Postby Antloony » Fri Mar 20, 2009 7:42 pm

Toks, its me who's in contact with him.

Ben, he does ride for Sutton I think but he feels he's wasting his time there.
User avatar
Antloony
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 1953
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 5:08 pm
Location: Sutton

Re: ChainGang 17.03

Postby Andrew G » Fri Mar 20, 2009 8:58 pm

Gear restrictions should always be adhered to, they are there to protect while your body is still growing and developing.

Sutton is a good club for young riders but they exist to encourage young riders and get them started. When they get older they are asked to look for another club as Sutton don't have a senior section so Jack is probably feeling as though he may be wasting his time as their attention will be geared towards younger children.
Andrew G
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 10477
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 6:47 pm
Location: Selsdon

Re: ChainGang 17.03

Postby -Adam- » Sat Mar 21, 2009 2:19 am

Once again Paul I shall bow down to your superior road racing knowledge. I mean its not like 4 fully qualified coaches with probably close to 100 years experience would know what their talking about is it? I guess they must have gotten several riders racing abroad just on pure chance, riders that they have developed since they were around Jack's age.

I'm sure Huw will not advocate Jack riding on a 53/11.

Why do I do it? Because I am a last year espoir, I am not subject to gear restriction. I do it because it increases the strength I have over all gears. It has been very noticable in my ability to handle cross winds, and stay seated on climbs where others are wasting energy out the saddle. But like I say, my coach must know nothing. I mean he's never been in a rowing boat, so why the hell would he know about training cyclists.
User avatar
-Adam-
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 3515
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 9:38 pm
Location: Kingston/Epsom, well, everywhere really!

Re: ChainGang 17.03

Postby Paul H » Sat Mar 21, 2009 5:42 pm

I think it is good training doing big gear work. Its not me who said "If you can't race on the big gears, you may as well not train on them either".

If your coaches can explain why juniors shouldnt use bigger gears on a chaingang to keep up on decents, I am prepared to listen. Making a statement with no justification will always make me ask why.

Successful training is not a dark art and far more simple than people like to make out. If a coach is lucky to get a rider with exceptional talent, it isnt that hard to make them a successful.

Im not pointing the finger at anybody in particular but im cynical of most coaches including rowing and other sports. Look at Brian Ashton, various England football coaches etc. A lot of them have got where they are by following the party line or claiming success for something they had no contribution.
Paul H
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 1648
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2003 5:26 pm
Location: Coulsdon

Re: ChainGang 17.03

Postby -Adam- » Sun Mar 22, 2009 1:36 am

My point is, I am eligable to use big gears in a race, and so I train on them also.

I'm sure my coaches could explain a lot to you, Paul, but I think their priorities lie with their riders, and not your good self. It's not rocket science. It's accepted wisdom that over stressing juvenile muscles is damaging in the long term. The no pain no gain school of thought on training many seem to have is total rubbish, I'm sure you can at least agree on that.

You're right, training is not a dark art. As such I am at a loss for words for the totall lack of quality to many riders ''training''.

Generally, in cycling, things are the way they are because over 100 years plus, things have been proven to work.
User avatar
-Adam-
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 3515
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 9:38 pm
Location: Kingston/Epsom, well, everywhere really!

Re: ChainGang 17.03

Postby Paul H » Sun Mar 22, 2009 7:50 pm

Ive googled this and cannot see any evidence supporting over stressing junior muscles. Gear restrictions would not stop this anyway unless juniors are banned from riding up hills as well. Im sure Rugby, Running, Rowing and various other school sports put more strain on muscles.

Gear restrictions would surely affect the performance of certain riders depending on there muscle fibre FT/ST makeup, leg length, size etc which could put them off cycle racing.

Quality means differnt things to different people and I would say things have moved on over 100 years.
Paul H
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 1648
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2003 5:26 pm
Location: Coulsdon

Re: ChainGang 17.03

Postby Toks » Sun Mar 22, 2009 8:44 pm

[quote="Antloony"]Toks, its me who's in contact with him.

Ben, he does ride for Sutton I think but he feels he's wasting his time there.
Good stuff Anthony. Do the right thing and get him signed up to the agreeables
Toks
lives on this board 24/7!!!
 
Posts: 4107
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2003 10:17 pm
Location: Highbury, North London
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Training

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests

cron