by Toks » Fri Mar 27, 2009 10:24 pm
[quote="mlocke"]
The weights
I think one or two go the wrong end of the stick with regard to the weights. They are on my bike, under my seat post and another at the front. Both are on my heavier commuting bike. My theory behind this is that a heavier bike would make riding generally harder so that when I get back on my lighter racing bike the ‘training’ effect of being on the heavy bike with additional weight would be felt.
Ok well I'm glad to hear the weights aren't on your ankles but the question still remains? Is it event specific training? Clearly not. As I've suggested
you're most likely putting out the same effort and riding slightly slower. If you want to train harder - ride faster. Simple. Training doesn't need to be complicated and unless you've got got loads of training time available totally event-specific. And by the way, I know you didn't say but just in case you were wondering strength isn't the key component when it comes to endurance cycling. But don't get me started on that one
[quote="mlocke"]
My GoalsSecondary target is Palace and trying to do as well as possible
Come on mate that 'goal has got 'it-doesn't -really- matter-how-well-I do-vibes-about-it'. Put your cards on the table and make your 'goal' more quantifiyable.How about...
1. Ride with the bunch for 6 laps
2. Ride with the bunch for 10 laps
3. Finish with the bunch
4. Get a top 15 placing etc
by mlocke » Sat Mar 28, 2009 2:42 pm
[quote]you're most likely putting out the same effort and riding slightly slower
I'm not riding slower with the weights on. I was in the 19's before the weights on my racing bike which is lighter. I am now on my heavier commuter, with slime in the wheels and an extra few kilos in weights. With this I am still in the 19's and still putting in my turns at the front. I agree that if I were riding slower then there would be no point in adding the weight.
[quote]strength isn't the key component when it comes to endurance cycling
Maybe not. I think there are lots of pther things that come into play such as tacticts, poisitioning and technique. However I do think that the basic raw power needs to be there in order for you to be in a position for the others to come into play. As I think I said earlier I refuse to believe that riding a heavier bike will not increase my power as I have been doing this for a couple of weeks and have noticed that it is more difficult. If not why would people looking to build strength use progressive loading? If I can get up a hill on a bike that is twice as heavy as those around me and do it in the same amount of time surely when I use a bike that is lighter I will ride up that hill quicker than those around me or I will find it easier? To me this is basic logic?
[quote]Put your cards on the table
Fair enough although cards have been shown in describing in quite a bit of details what I have been up to and what I would like to do. However I accept your point and I would like to achieve:
- Finish the triathlon in a respectable time. What respectable is yet I dont know as my swimming still has some way to go before I will be able to complete it
- With regard to Palace I dont see why I shouldnt aim for the top or atleast as close as I can so I would like points this year. I have thought about racing at the 'easier' races such as hillingdon but Palace is where I started and feel that I need to prove to myself that i can do it.
Anyway, I think that is pretty qantifiable and to the point?
Must say too that I am quite enjoying findin out peoples opinions on this and quite like the fact that a few of you think I am a bit nuts but it would also be good to hear a few other peoples ideas?
Locky