This sort of reminds me of a weird personal development seminar I did a couple of years ago, the 'Landmark Forum'. Although it was a good way to stop your procrastinating and it was cheap(ish), there was no coaching over a long period of time and no follow-up other than in order to get you to sign up for the next cheap(ish) course. They didn't give a rats ass about you, just your money. It smacked of cultism.
It appears from Andrew Sellars points that you 'just gotta believe' in doing the FaCT stuff. Which is NOT good.
It is difficult to understand what Juerg is talking about at times, which doesn't help matters. Also I suspect that most of us don't know enought about physiology to be able to sort the bullion from the bull.
The fundamental way I see in that FaCT differs from the Landmark course (and any other parallel you could mention) is that
1. FaCT are forever saying ' do the research' so it's obvious that they think they have a physiologically correct way of improving performance.
2. They are precicely about long term development, so they are vested in you and your continued development long term.
3. It doesn't cost a lot to do it - you can do lots of stuff on your own when you have your LBP sorted out, you don't need to buy any of the other stuff.
4. Sometimes, when all else fails and you have got yourself onto a plateau, you just gotta give these things a try. Not too much lost if it doesn't work, eh!
Still, lots of people will be having a good old larf if we all come a cropper. We can just dust ourselves down and try something else